No. 23-573
Tina Bastian Veneskey v. Michael Keith Sulier
Tags: custody custody-determination due-process error-of-law fourteenth-amendment full-faith-and-credit jurisdiction jurisdictional-determination legal-error state-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Full Faith and Credit Clause precludes the enforcement of a State's jurisdictional determination when that very determination is based upon an error of law
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Full Faith and Credit Clause precludes the enforcement of a State’s jurisdictional determination when that very determination is based upon an error of law. 2. Whether a State’s failure to afford a party a meaningful opportunity to be heard prior to a custody determination is violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-09-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
Attorneys
Tina Veneskey
Andrew Jackson Wingo — Homesley and Wingo Law Group, PLLC, Petitioner
Andrew Jackson Wingo — Homesley and Wingo Law Group, PLLC, Petitioner