No. 23-5737
Roger Wilson v. Department of Justice, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights dobbs-precedent due-process equal-protection fundamental-rights history-and-tradition obergefell-v-hodges originalist-interpretation same-sex-marriage substantive-due-process unenumerated-rights
Key Terms:
Environmental LaborRelations
Environmental LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson apply to same-sex marriage rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION 1) Since the United States Supreme Court’s ruling on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization that any rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, and not deeply rooted in the history and traditions of the Nation are unconstitutional. Since same-sex marriage rights meet the exact same criteria established by the Court in Dobbs v Jackson, should not the Court’s finding in that case also apply to same-sex marriage rights?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2023-12-30
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Department of Justice, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 9, 2023)
Attorneys
Department of Justice, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent