Whether the District Court erred in denying the same 4th Amendment protection of legal intrusion as the initial entry question

QUESTTONS Presented | pus sian: Dial Te Dist Cou Caan DistpreTD in Cre V hh, F185. 862 CP 2™ DA 2008) FA 16 Fellaw (73 oon Cis ll lg preceded (n 2014 cas oF A ila MMagal kitty Tale by Tha lave Cool th The der TiAl sme Latiolnal Vilas by Tk SAE, IdetTical CATIRS OF prin FFial msondad witha! Pitan nahh Te The Same identical Uld Sills clan in Pe Ane Did Coq BLA Ditiel Conl Mas identical Cras OF Wag Wes by law) kntorcgnen, prion fein stnducl oF The. lures Billy Ard SEA Ch OF meh LTR A SubsépuRnTly Conse APLEP ThE iaitial entry, uesin: Lehy dda or Stovld have Th Dislet Dort Puck UV gd te SAME EULER Y® Armandineit profection oF egal introsion 2 16 A irled Soles Clean 3) WETION. Does ADEE Cott hove b loll (Tan CAL Maw ? , Lif OF Papties All aus AReEA In Thee Coolio aF The, Crskon The COV LAGE, + Sypréme, Cool oF Florida , | ° Jubyas Labargh, Cound Grasshans, FIANCS SASSO | Kill CASBS Grail Wilh, C18 92.1d 962 Che AM QCA 1208) ' opens Below wwe | wnisdiction 2, COnéiitolinal Ad Sailor Pansins iwolid 3 Steléminl oF The CAR Us Reams lop Grniting The li 6 Conalusion 7 Ageend A”: Ondgt denying pT Tin Fan lini OF Hibhas CPUS, Pita SYNE Cony Cae *'6C1023-0 704, Toy 13, 2023 CARE ; Grail 0 AE, PF S.2d 962 Ci 2 WATE) _ Sates fad kul United Sblas 5° Animal | United Ses |0 Antadnand ~ lant IN THE . SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES , PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Petitioner respectfully prays that a writ of certiorari issue to review the judgment below. OPINIONS BELOW [ ] For cases from federal courts: : The opinion of the United States court of appeals appears at