Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying Mr. Hawes' petition for a certificate of appealability concerning the district court's denial of his federal habeas corpus petition

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Mp, Hawes alkne Uhl We Uniteol Seles Couel, ob Agoesals Peo Vhe Ninth Ceci? dental for 2 cerdifiasts of eppilobil CoNCEmING, Uniti Sites custrick court deel 6 Ma. Neges fideral ce eb Covi proce, Bis Wht oS wend. Ma dengs Made 2 substedtel shag ¢ He dawel Pa coda} hitioue) Hatt The WINK cireull Jewel Ma. Hades ley es the ane AYPEOEARE ViE6S thet \arists Ov (evel weuld Laud —— debefave Shear the ete Sets & velig clam ot She daniel | “ah we conetthationel Clattt Aud Rat wrists OF Bestal emule 1 Kdebaleble rohatter district ond us comet at Ms procedure be rai uses net shadn. he case hos prermuts He TH lortug , Aube Ali coreuth ane te stoned tec We | serpin dloudad 15 “substettix! shania chet He dase ones dsc HS Aractetiow At dawing we fwle Fee ragtinn), (ects tek , She Zuqrant Cal's AECEIOIS Ub Harbicdsl Grick Gruzalez. Ane RE F Kath cocut 5 dadisteal ws rad at the distrzk caus | Plegeuk bs eeding OF Ma Nees 44d tetrad 2g B CWIE Lodle) | anisyt, thus, His 0S BN EEL esti Gist (tes Gn barged Biel CHE TEEN, a daitel g CoA Ber 4 Pale S?Q (Mobi) ad 7 sta be decided ihe US. Supreme Eat. | , C1) |