No. 23-5747

Daryl A. Hess v. Oklahoma

Lower Court: Oklahoma
Docketed: 2023-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment appellate-jurisdiction civil-rights constitutional-issue due-process evidentiary-hearing federal-review habeas-corpus judicial-procedure newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals properly denied Petitioner due process and Eighth Amendment rights by refusing to consider newly discovered evidence, granting no evidentiary hearing, and failing to correct clear constitutional violations

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1, Should thS Covh?t HRéat Ys p&ifan aS he bas cokpus, elhén ef fone File) 2th his covet & LG AS Faasy petition, rh& CORLL OF YhiS CORY hehedrid Zp end! olikeck! Aefieak # Submit a edkitof CRN oKaRI, PRoihing AE Pens aro! CMKEO}ING Cakkeed thin GO Hey S2, Shovie) Th'S Covk décth€ to Erboece StaTE Coveds PRo Chole | bok, hin Stek Coukp bask) FHS Liachings 071 Fécks thet Ai fot eis? eref REALS) ew hralled ge Molly NSovivedy) Cikace AS, Shovid thE pRosecuine, with full Anoollické of contnefot Zaks) cvs. 0 SubSevéay. AbUREStafehbn by olefensé Counse/, nev. Za fen o the Court, cad! by foiling 7) GH SO eS Paay fo ASS Aba | Ydlayion, ao/ Exeuses, AP Menkes failvee 10 Abjecy Moe Ke teed : U elie hebeas Cokpus REvidw Usually ZS no} avetkhié fo + ole tinoknd who céleulis ca Reising ® Cnshtuhional ZS8v6 Xr Sha fe Dud, s/ainalhight V, SYKES, Y23 US. 72, g2-93 0977), TAése Rules hovd nkvse béta =71V0Keo/ by Ih’ Covets Za Svccéssvé RE DRESEA Ye) 0 cases, Shovid tas FSSvE be. dsloutte! sthén Aaftionde cJeS MEV eoliste), thEReee MVE? Givdq Cheacé fo ob) ect (ThS would 68 ates potnd of Lead) “5 Did Pettonse have to bfécd 4 thE Suess vent he prestabtion Rioe fo Teich 7 [Ki SbevE xssvé Be cpese/. Fad lowéR Coviets hevé no oppuitd a confémpokaneas odjéclon Rul Za Successt ve REPRE sénteyiin Cases, ZA thé fled Gases WhSes (htege fo Objset eS USéo/ 95 Beason nok to REVERSE, ZA Each CSE phaae etes Cynteace the offtsrelent Wes aoderé of HE SUBSE iad Ripretséabyion TAE Supreint Coukl res not Auléh on this ZSSvE5, Previous, Atlornty YE on fo Repktsiat © of (Mackaf aac Sait Alitatss <a Same Cage ore) Zilalée) Cases, noi only cei) bo Asclosé Conklict of Za/ aes/ we Me Cove bu) Eagapal A % Caspitacy fo Conti) KER Zavolvénind fom prhjande, aloes this Derolee kt. Tevel Fonotambnitetly vets ore 28 Senchons on HioRaey Qvéstions PRs ented Zz Did the eK ehoma Cue of cRiminc! AyppieedlS clkay Petibonsk due focéss end) tborh hutn A Yeeently then ofh&K Sin lakly Situ pet&e/ zadi vidtalS by etd Evol ba horey héeRing, ZG20KRg N&cg ASCOVERES EVIDENCE , GYIY.NG ery (hoch at bee @velleolé Sasso! O87 “0/7Kyser faok, poss fis Kécoto/ Show phég St-yéI Srlbat on lo CoIKA abuse of cbse} fen. G Di Tolsa Policé ofliceR Renolal So loron maliciously Fog eh zo {his Zavéstaater 10 Cla WIS own MEIC end! fora’ (2100 éX, Oe) $uuS YiololE thE US. ConSAi hon, Ara! 25 PACKS of Unktlat&/ CaSE onde o rc pemed F002 EN fhové Sods St. q. OM Tise polee offerr CHES IH FEbRI OPE a Conttsycu on fstiione’® amd Oss EK Zn JARMa KS BSE pK ~his. 1ODeol thé pRoSécv}ek qué ZS Stee WANES, TESIca Soloman Special WReofmntal of a pléa fal one! not ACS LI, xn ta Ca88 end fI0 AASS , ACE oINES LIS Torptech Eo Jl, edeS Tal ano! oqoelete counsel cnéMECH LE ft Bllng ” rolielly 8. Subséedea/ Rephéscrk ter of BunS8/, ptt EALK Cle fot aap eee mo Kral RECO, Goes thes poebolvdte. Kaksiip arse. 12. 00 Shesd KKons Sitolately tad fakia foods shot) 2 Skids MSCoerogé of Jule. c7 Uiefalor of | 13, The Stele Aopeed ver completly aboncoaée>/ KKkonov$ Prolngs of factored Conciasieas of let) 1108 lay Treat Cour/ fo Zmpoosé PRoceot/ Col boll, Znolfiahhng theg croteesfore) HE Rotings tI16C€ =n CoKkect, Shou RGE4et VRS nko’ (ROC Sika bar /4. Doss phe PACH TOlSa County Special Tw, pho leeks Suksect role Foprscietion & averse Felony CSS, ZAMRvEned = YS CASE end dialed) PAStconuictten, M00] propre te okbbineen f ZAVeMalg KE Rongs 2 Shale. CRE And fect SfeJss AppEhter’ Coukd. GleS ChWSEd gh c8sue ond! (Bilt) fe coKES 2) Show) HBS clit rol enc) Conor Ger Q Fas REWEI =A OK home @uRK? | IS, Do€S Fock Spécial Jue aJho locke) Sub) ccf maf{se JuRé aeten fo OUERSEE [D0St Conurctien, alo zafskvened ord CCniéd) Appuectsen, Fell ; qime linifellons (68 Fao hed REY), AS his clk en TL Tr Keel M0 GECISIA on] AM, R ZS =f GRovnels RR Eavittabié: tolling KG, ZA ign of clk of Covk} RefRaleg BUCS AISY /fsfitien cid cholboing HESS 18 NCoRMEOS" Cvith cm AMlHh off CHEM ORE! Faconeeefly Slashing Mess (eile 2 mY wrth Pilag Réqgui

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2023-12-11
Supplemental brief of petitioner Daryl A. Hess filed. (Distributed)
2023-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-07-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Daryl A. Hess
Daryl A. Hess — Petitioner
Daryl A. Hess — Petitioner