Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in its analysis

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by declaring a non-expert as a POSITA despite all the evidence presented to the contrary. 2. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by relying on unsupported statements against the Petitioner in the face of reliable published evidence to the contrary. 3. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by affirming the decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidating the challenged claims of US Patent 7,802,571 while none of the requirements of those claims were met by any combinations of the alleged prior art. 4. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred by using a) a paper presenting untrue results and b) a fatal device against the challenged claims of US Patent 7,802,571. 5. Whether the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) erred by affirming the decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidating the challenged claims of U.S. Patent 7,802,571 while none of the requirements of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) were met by either of the alleged grounds, and against the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Precedents of the Federal Circuit.