No. 23-5757

Marigdalia K. Ramirez-Fort v. Medical University of South Carolina, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights defendant-contacts due-process forum-contacts forum-state-interests minimum-contacts personal-jurisdiction state-interests
Key Terms:
DueProcess Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What objective factors should courts rely upon to determine personal jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. What objective factors should courts rely upon in order to determine when personal jurisdiction is proper in cases where claims may lack strict causal relationship to a defendant’s contacts with a forum? 2. Under what conditions does a State’s interests in guaranteeing the protection, wellbeing and fair treatment of its citizens and residents create ; minimum contacts sufficient to assert personal jurisdiction over an action where a non-resident defendant. with meaningful contacts within the forum recruits its domiciliary to study and work out of state and then subjects her to violations of her civil, contractual, statutory and constitutional rights? F ‘ ' ii

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-26
Waiver of right of respondent Medical University of South Carolina, et al. to respond filed.
2023-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Marigdalia K. Ramirez-Fort
Marigdalia K. Ramirez-Fort — Petitioner
Marigdalia K. Ramirez-Fort — Petitioner
Medical University of South Carolina, et al.
Dylan Bradley CarpJackson Lewis P.C., Respondent
Dylan Bradley CarpJackson Lewis P.C., Respondent