Did the Tenth Circuit incorrectly hold that Mr. Redbird's claim was not preserved, where context made the basis of his objection to exclude the prosecution's propensity evidence clear, and therefore satisfied the preservation requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 103?

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Tenth Circuit incorrectly hold that Mr. Redbird’s claim was not preserved, where context made the basis of his objection to exclude the prosecution’s propensity evidence clear, and therefore satisfied the preservation requirement of Federal Rule of Evidence 103? i STATEMENT OF RELATED CASES United States v. Redbird, No. 19-cr-00347-F (W.D. Okla.) Judgment entered April 1, 2022 United States v. Redbird, No. 22-6055 (10th Cir.) Judgment entered July 10, 2023 ii