No. 23-5769

Brandon M. Jefferson v. Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of Nevada, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights counsel-right criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance nevada-law right-to-counsel sixth-amendment state-law
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the petitioner have the Sixth Amendment right to be represented by legal counsel during all stages of his criminal prosecution in the state of Nevada, and specifically, during a scheduled calendar call?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DID THe PETITIONER Have THe SIXTH PMENOMENT RIGHT UNDER THE U.S, . CONSTITUTION To BE REPRESENTED By LEGAL COUNSEL DURING ALL SiRGES Of HIS CRIMINAL PRoSECUTION iN THE STATE OF NEVADA, AnD SPECIFICALLY, During & SCHEDULED CALENDAR CALL 2 2. Dip The PeTITIowER Have THE SixTH AMENDMENT RIGHT To THE EFFECTIVE . ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL DURING HS CRIMINAL PROSECUTION IN THE STATE OF NEevape 2 3B. DOES THE PREsuMPTION oF PResudice AND/OR UNRELIABILITy ATTACH To A CAIMNAL, PROCEEDING IN WHICH THE PETITIONER WAS TOTALLY WITHoutT COUNSEL IN THE STATE OF NEvADA UNDER THe LAWS oF thE UNITED STATES AND THE US. Constitution 2

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-14
Waiver of right of respondent Aaron Ford to respond filed.
2023-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Aaron Ford
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent
Brandon Jefferson
Brandon M. Jefferson — Petitioner
Brandon M. Jefferson — Petitioner