No. 23-5776
Andrea Lamont Medlock v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure federal-authority imprisonment-review judicial-discretion plain-error reasonableness revocation sentencing-review sentencing-standards standard-of-review supervised-release
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether sentences of imprisonment following the revocation of supervised release should be reviewed for reasonableness or plain unreasonableness?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether sentences of imprisonment following the revocation of supervised release should be reviewed for reasonableness or plain unreasonableness? i
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2023-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)
Attorneys
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent