No. 23-5779

Donovan Romo v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process forfeiture-doctrine judicial-discretion plain-error sentencing sentencing-procedure standard-of-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a defendant forfeit a challenge to the manner in which the district court imposed sentence by failing to object after the sentence is pronounced, even though the district court does not invite additional objections after it announces the sentence and before it concludes the sentencing-hearing?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Does a defendant forfeit a challenge to the manner in which the district court imposed sentence by failing to object after the sentence is pronounced, even though the district court does not invite additional objections after it announces the sentence and before it concludes the sentencing hearing? Statement of

Docket Entries

2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Donovan Romo
Margaret Alice-Anne FarrandFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent