No. 23-5783

Edward Francis Davis v. Power Authority of the State of New York, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process equal-protection evidence-handling in-forma-pauperis judicial-precedent procedural-fairness sanctions supervisory-power
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

whether-petitioner-was-treated-unfairly-and-unequally

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Petitioner and Edward Francis Davis, believes the lower courts have “so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings” for his Civil Rights prima facie case brought by Petitioner who appears before the court in forma pauperis and disabled, suffering from a chronic disease compounded by moderate depression and severe anxiety, that by his application herein calls upon this Supreme Court of the United States “an exercise of this Court’s supervisory power.” Petitioner brings to question whether he was treated unfairly and unequally in light of lower court precedent for human rights cases. Moreover, Petitioner brings to question whether Respondents received preferential treatment where appropriate sanctions went unassessed for civil procedure deviations and evidence handling infractions. 2

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-13
Brief of respondents Power Authority of the State of New York, et al. in opposition filed.
2023-08-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 13, 2023)

Attorneys

Edward Francis Davis
Edward Francis Davis — Petitioner
Power Authority of the State of New York, et al.
Brian BodanskyJackson Lewis P.C., Respondent