No. 23-5791
John Sherman Jumper v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-sentencing disgorgement double-jeopardy fifth-amendment kokesh-precedent kokesh-v-sec sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
ERISA FifthAmendment Securities
ERISA FifthAmendment Securities
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the prior disgorgement punishment precludes a criminal sentence or sentencing enhancement based on the same misconduct under the Double Jeopardy Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THIS COURT’S HOLDING IN KOKESH V. SEC. WHICH HELD THAT DISGORGEMENT IS A PENALTY, PRECLUDES EITHER THE IMPOSITION OF A CRIMINAL SENTENCE IN ITS ENTIRETY AND/OR A SIXTEEN-LEVEL ENHANCEMENT BASED UPON THE AMOUNT OF LOSS, BECAUSE THE PRIOR DISGORGEMENT PUNISHMENT, BASED UPON THE SAME MISCONDUCT, VIOLATES THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT? i
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2023)
Attorneys
John Jumper
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
Edward J. Rymsza III — Miele & Rymsza, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent