No. 23-5795
Benjamin D. Morrow v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-1746 civil-procedure declaration declaration-requirements fourth-amendment oath-clause oath-or-affirmation perjury perjury-standard statutory-interpretation u.s.c.-section-1746
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1746 requires an affirmative statement that the declaration's contents are true under penalty of perjury
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1746 requires, in writing, an affirmative statement that the declaration's contents are "true" to support, establish, or prove that the matter subscribed to is true under penalty of perjury. II. Whether a statutorily deficient declaration, under 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that is unsupported by a verbal oath, can satisfy the Fourth Amendment's Oath or Affirmation Clause. i
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent