Whether absolute immunity shields government employees who report false information/omit exculpatory information

QUESTIONS PRESENTED The issues in this case should have been addressed and stopped in 2001 when the racism occurred. In a system with no checks/balances, victims in financial survival mode/shock and the ; government via the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission refusing to take on the government (Maricopa CountyAttorney’s Office and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office) in this case. i. Whether absolute immunity shields government employees who report false information/omit exculpatory information in the investigation stage as well as those government employees who falsify criminal reports (both a civil tort and criminal offense that has no statute of limitations) and who collude with other branches of the government to violate Constitutional Rights and Due Process of Law? As to this question, there is a circuit split between the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit : here, and Demaree v. Laura Pederson and Amy Van Ness, D.C. No. 2:11-cv-00046ROS (9th Cir. 2018), the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Preshie Hardwick, PlaintiffAppellee, v. County of Orange, Defendant, and Marcia Vreeken; Elaine Wilkins; The Estate of Helen Dwojak, No. 15-55563 D.C. No. 8:13-cv-01390JLS-AN (9th Cir. 2017) and United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth circuit, Sarah Greene, personally and as next friend for §.G., a minor, and K.G, a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant No. 0635333 v. D.C. No. CV-05-06047-AA Bob Camreta; Deschutes County; James Alford, Deschutes County Opinion i Deputy Sheriff Bend Lapine School District; Terry Friesen, Defendants Appellees (9th Cir. 2009). ii. Does the Federal Government’s Authority include monitoring the application of state laws by government authorities when those agencies have a history of collusion between government agencies to violate those state laws to enable them to violate civil rights in the case of state laws regarding public information requests? To Impose Conditions on Grant Funds per the -Spending Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution [federal dollars funding both the . Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office] create an obligation for Federal oversight. The Ninth Circuit backs up a 2017 ruling by U. S. District Court Judge Roslyn Silver that BK. v McKay could proceed as a class-action lawsuit. Silver had identified the plaintiffs’ allegations as a valid basis for challenging “statewide practices affecting the proposed General Class.” B.K.,, by her next friend Margaret Tinsley; B.T., by their next friend Jennifer Kupiszewski; A.C.-B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; M.C.B., by their next friend Susan Brandt; D.C.-B., by their next friend . Susan Brandt; JM, by their next friend Susan Brandt, Plaintiffs Appellees, v. Jami Snyder, in her official capacity as Director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, DefendantAppellant. No. 17-17501 D.C. No. 2:15-ev-00185ROS’ (9th Cir. 2019). iii. Does fraud upon the Court permit the Federal Court to remand the original civil rights violation back to the day of termination with no statute of ; ii limitations, since the ramifications include internet reports as recent as Database: MCAO’s more secretive : ‘Brady’ list by Dave Biscobing, posted June 9, 2023, that by links moves easily back to AZ POST rulings back to 2000. Per Dave Biscobing’s article linked to the above article, “However, ironically, the lack of oversight and reliance on self-investigation means the system can break both ways. Police departments can use internal investigations and the Brady. list to retaliate against officers who blow the whistle.” Ironically Detective Robert Chagolla is not on the Brady List but is on AZPOST’s list due to the falsified police report. All found via link to the June 9, 2023 article. Robert Chagolla is still a certified law — : enforcement officer in Arizona, but there appears to be no way to remove the Maricopa County Minute Entry that is based on a falsifie