No. 23-5802
Erie Adams, aka Michael Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-precedent sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the defense counsel ineffective under Strickland v. Washington?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW In light of the facts of this case, was the defense counsel ineffective in light of this court’s precedent in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)? ii
Docket Entries
2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 15, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent