Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals failed to properly address the issues raised in the petition, including the failure to address the sufficiency of the evidence and the charging instruments

estion Preseited AY Dad “The Elevesth Greuit Court OF Agpasls Fail 2 Thi Eeiciay Dubes Whe onthe Fie, OF The RE (sad Tt Fixled To Ad masiser Susily The MAS OF 2) i Circut Court OF Appeals Ear ® | “ot Reasaiia, Plaats St aud pment Meet . Rigbts Te Hicrep . ‘1 Foo Value Aud Return Cop Value “pil the Cu rges Tn The Charging Testers? Yes! r Table OF CadTes!'s | Page. Ques Tios ) Prevestted «© © & © 1 —hble OF Costesty 2 etl it anble OF Ahontes 6 « 6 * ViLW. PRay ee, « ¢ ‘ é o «( o » 4 OPpiosy Below © 6 & £ & * * 2 Sumsdichios 6 ee CovstrhctiosnL Proviyzouy Tsvolved 2 « ¢ 9 STAEMaiT OF Case 2 © © © © o «= 48 Cosltuyiss © 8 6 lel 11 Thale oF Authorities Cited _Crses Pree Nuwhie DavidBows V. New GRLEARS . eas, 11 25a [6 © ee e oO 1A, Ser. Bay, SAL (178A) . . te 8 3714 U.S, 335 6 ° ° o » / crich Builders i San Bersardine Jor Cot, Rp 47 Gare) 6 o 6 e G . National Bask, WA Waley Lay US, 257 e e 6 6 e 8 Pewspoyen V. Nish 6 6 as US Tit « ° é ‘ 6 ® e 8 Seit V. Sertz §0 CAL. Rote. G98 ® ° 6 o e 6 6 Tug | Vi Wood rtf. ¢ . e 5 254 Cok Rpt. 2A. ISK 14 ‘ « 0 & Usotd Wide Valk vy Vv. . Lee US, ase 2a © e & @ e § iis US, V Holzer | Page Sib F2, 30%, 317 (4m) 6 . cle ° 8 ws. Vi Kis 632 29.536 (1#Gr) © e ° e 6 4S us Vv. lopez i Ho, O1-31SA © 6 e e é Ws. Vi Tweel. _ SSD F 2a, 297-229 . ‘ ° 3 e 8 —-ygusce testa) ° ~ eo 8 & RUST 3Bo62 SeciS@QO ° 6 « 4,1. Qe usc tas¢Q) « ° e 6 6 s 2 Reaulatiass . RICFR T21 & & 6 o lt,7. 5 IRS Mavul oe & 6 q @ * FRCP 2) 6 ¢ e 6 6 o + MAXIMS oF Ww « ‘ ° % 0 6 6f HS Tv Plastif$ Sosegh, Avex Pasdee C\prke ! gro “se renyed Selly request that 3 Writ OF Cecftcan 18Sue fe heviad the eaguet rsd Citron of the United States Court of Rgpeats For the Elevesth Great is dhe Case’, The Opinion 6X the United States Court OF Aqeals Appears nt, 22:14330 decided 6y 8:21:23 5 he Cpision OF The Usted Stes Ovtnck Gait Foe the Noatien Detect CF Growin Rppeats pt \22-CvFuck Lun” decried on 12-05-22 6 a. . _usisd icpion . The Tadquest oF The Gurl OF Appeals For he Eleven Crraust voy evtered on 3-21-23, This PRetstion For Gectiorasi TF “filed usethins the tine Pared Tequired ¢ The Surtsdiction OF Thes Quel 15 jovoked user, , Ax use (sua) | Cowstititiosal Rasd Spf Provisiols.. US, Const Pa. VW provides in pertwest gael ps Follaas § Nor be deprived oF rte, Liberty OR prgey voithat due Qroces 5 oF LAW 2 . US. Const. XW proudes ie petest Qart as Solloas 7 gSor shall sy State deprive oy person of Life Liberdy or Qropedy vsctheit due Process Of Law ¢ 3. ; Sikemesl oF Case Ploust £5 frends the record ao Apr 1B, 2022 by way of Feliysy his “@umacial AbRaant OF TRuitt fhereny Fulton | Cousty Clerks O¥fice , Stale OF Georgia , Clarion, wider y7 Cre 12 AM, AL Gimes Are Commercial futher shew Nh vader trile AB Ysc3es2 section IS@UO , States Sra the UNted Steyr TS | Q Federal. Comperation AeA WoT 4 opverones, Wdhdnog the \udice Procedural Section ’ | | PloasteFy asserts thet Usder Ws. Vi Kis, 632 Caecs), He | pseaded oul to Make a Priva ice shown, Aud hes Qroperey Fred Conmercist AFFrdquct OF That “is All thet bons isecessary to ! make the Case Rapmost Fhe deFeudacts NaMed ts this Complesst | | who Coutinqingly AQ OR othecusive teHMD Selenit te her Qropeely Pant Sule Shooz (hey t pxombie Supree Const oF theYurtel | Wor Mal:cioas us7iny thoy Plaats Complaast, TH Gol Awed q | “short eod lai stotenest of the chan showy, thay the leader ig ested fe fee") Fed Rw 0.@ 2), Stony her oyirebstted “ amercsal. APR Amort OF “Trt Y PlaashFF weald ithe Assert hat fo hes cusp Knowle asd belcefs Anch Aczoranly +6 the Maxis OF LAO bad hy US,