Jason Wayne Oien v. Chad Pringle, Warden
Question not identified
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ZL. Although <L olcendy did he Hime LT shoulbnt have this charge ON my Cetord, Was a mi , 4 a) SCaC Care oF Tuskice to h Een | OF ASE OH aks, : Nae “my Lassgers advice instead of a Sury trial? Was Poe Su (aS an Prejudicial 2 Was about “Wespassing. 3 Rule \l, was there Specific Factual Basis te question Quilt or to Find me Quilty of Hye charging instrument & Y a y % Fg astra to Find 4 Delivery Chatge 2 OVE OS.1OV, Detinitions, “Delile ‘o¢ “bd ‘ " Mean | Ackual, Constructive of atten. wis one pee he PX8 teonsfer Lom OO NCH Aceh Sipe 3. Charging ast cuttant Shei We SON ogency Celorions hi oO, Fromivked Acxs ~ fenaliies MSE Punishwunt wadye I{-03,\-23 ™ Fo Mati \uana Char. anot w 1 71 um Pusons home @ . “CM Lahen It vAS in a " AV321-01, Runedy-T whem Tila) Was Conviction violation of Jaw and “acts (f) Changes ha vn la alee anton S Wr PAVE bean made in law Where iy (mariana charges zu © should only cetrospectively ee was T wt . Caw about any Areal Plocess im This Case if any 2 These wor mar ‘ : | Lay en ee ndings and should be consibered vekronctwe and wo. Was Case illegal accusations and Findings of q Tad to Say E Was guilty of any Cr me} , : HW. Did & wWarye my Cg nrs to a yucy 4eio\ 3, ‘Was there EVER 4 Conderronal Plan Was trace Over Factual evidence of how much was our 2 in His COXR QU of erartiuana, % Was hate Edidence of PassSSION in anathers home!