No. 23-5808
Rodney Jennings v. Shawn Phillips, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability doyle-rule doyle-v-ohio habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jackson-standard jackson-v-virginia legal-sufficiency strickland-test strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability and in evaluating petitioner's claim under Jackson v. Virginia, Doyle v. Ohio, and Strickland v. Washington?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the court of appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability and in evaluating petitioner's claim under Jackson v. Virginia, Doyle v. Ohio, and Strickland v. Washington? : ii
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent Shawn Phillips to respond filed.
2023-08-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Rodney Jennings
Rodney Jennings — Petitioner
Shawn Phillips
John Henry Bledsoe III — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent