No. 23-5810

Christopher L. Laureano-Perez v. United States

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-17
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability constitutional-claim constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel jury-verdict procedural-error section-2255-motion
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2023-11-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if the First Circuit of Appeals erred in not granting a certificate of appealability?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Should a writ of certiorari be granted to determine if the First Circuit of Appeals erred in not granting a certificate of appealability? 2. Should a writ of certiorari is required to examine whether the district court's failure to address the motion for eave of court to supplement Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255, considering Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 15, and its denial of Laureano-Perez's opportunity to file a reply to the government's defenses, constituted an error? 3. Does a Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion make a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right by sufficiently alleging a constitutional claim regarding whether trial counsel's failure to object to an improper jury verdict form, which was presented to the jury, rendered Laureano-Perez's conviction invalid? ii

Docket Entries

2023-11-13
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/9/2023.
2023-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2023)

Attorneys

Christopher Laureano-Perez
Christopher L. Laureano-Perez — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent