Does testimony from a lab analyst who did not perform the actual testing on Defendant's seized (alleged) contraband that was analyzed by a State Police Laboratory, and further cannot remember whether or not she supervised the non-certified analyst who performed the actual testing on said contraband, violate the United States Constitution's 6th Amendment confrontation clause, and therefore also contra to the tenets of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009) and its well-settled progeny

QUESTION PRESENTED Does testimony from a lab analyst who did not perform the actual testing on Defendant’s seized (alleged) contraband that was analyzed by a State Police Laboratory, and further cannot remember whether or not she supervised the non-certified analyst who performed the actual testing on said contraband, violate the United States Constitution’s 6" Amendment confrontation clause, and therefore also contra to the tenets of Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009) and its well-settled progeny.