No. 23-5824
Alex Adams v. Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
IFP
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
How can the FTC prove that they have an actual injury to a consumer's rights?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1, How Cad E (aN FelIMe FEE whew TD PRoutd THUY TARE AU MA O¢prtT's? | lie _ J5 SG RET Tp CUNOE WE POR A ACTURL DVNOLEUE CLAPH BASE OW New Guspeuce? , THE DS & Ay Fee Dole PELDNs PE BY US pc Unt PS Tous 4 Fore Gus 2 , "Se ET RoC TE HAVE HAO Ty FOUS THD ACTURLCWec eq Clea JU MANY TDs, _ > THE FONE Tru PUNO Wy Stow T HAUT Us MOBY 5 s Hoo HUG Alor oF QDeKEl's oF SINUMENT oF ACLOWT'S , OUT TATH Lenape
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2023-11-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2023)