No. 23-5826
Mary Ann German v. South Carolina
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure davis-good-faith-exception exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment good-faith-exception judicial-precedent police-conduct retroactivity
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-23
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the police get a grace period under the Davis good faith exception after a decision of this Court makes a state statute unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED After a decision of this Court makes a state statute unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, do the police get a grace period after this Court’s decision under the Davis good faith exception? i
Docket Entries
2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2024-01-30
Reply of petitioner Mary Ann German filed.
2024-01-18
Brief of respondent South Carolina in opposition filed.
2023-12-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2024.
2023-12-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2023 to January 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-20
Response Requested. (Due December 20, 2023)
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-01
Waiver of right of respondent State of South Carolina to respond filed.
2023-09-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 16, 2023)
Attorneys
Mary Ann German
South Carolina
Mark Reynolds Farthing — S.C. Office of the Attorney General, Respondent