Whether the First Amendment right to access the internet recognized in Packingham applies to criminal defendants who are on supervised release

question presented is: Whether the First Amendment right to access the internet recognized in Packingham applies to criminal defendants who are on supervised release. 2. In Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), the Court held that, “folther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury.” In Southern Union Co. v. United States, 567 U.S. 348, 360 (2012), the Court “hle]ld that the rule of Apprendi applies to the imposition of criminal fines.” The second question presented is: Whether the Sixth Amendment prohibits a court from ordering criminal restitution based on facts not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.’ LA similar Apprendi question—in the distinct context of criminal forfeiture—is presented in Esformes v. United States, U.S. No. 23-95 (pet. filed July 31, 2013). i