No. 23-5844

Loretta J. Alford v. Jeffrey Koses, Chairman, Committee for Purchase/AbilityOne, et al.

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2023-10-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection federal-court-system federal-rules standing witness witness-examination
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Under the Constitution the 14th Amendment it gives everyone equal protection of the law, so why am I required to comply with all federal rules and regulations and no one else? 2. Why has Loretta who’s Black been denied Due Process by the Court System violating her Constitutional Rights without notice and a hearing with a witness or the opportunity to be heard? 3. Can a decision be rendered by any Federal Court without Due Process, and non-compliant to rules and regulations and still be unbiased at the same time? : 4, Does the Federal Court Systems have authority to utilize both Rule 611 (Mode and Order of Examining Witnesses) and Rule 614 (Calling and Interrogation of Witness by Court) to stop the harassment against Ms. Alford’s expert witness when involved in a court proceeding? 5. In the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget it indicated that the agency was settling a civil case. If this $1.8 million wasn’t for Ms. Alford, then who was it for? (The fiscal year has ended so where is this money)? . 1° i

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-11-20
Waiver of right of respondent Federal Parties to respond filed.
2023-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2023)

Attorneys

Federal Parties
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Loretta J. Alford
Loretta Jean Alford — Petitioner