Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen v. United States
Whether the federal courts erred in dismissing claims that the 2020 presidential election violated the equal protection clause, due process, and the right to vote
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Gla “aif men au cindad oqitel “forasordls of the US. Constididion oxpedt all whe works for tHe Anan car qpwurmu, ay Magy | 4 Amsneca, and \004 ¢ canociaay dotlowers ty aude with ny (oso, Did the oy pial cowit arr in ataling faded anda overtthouse Ce “all mo av Crafled! aqua “words of the frocem ble 4 Hee Declaredion f Trdependence would cecognine that — TH Toon iy belly probed iw fe Gia an all: a an -carctiel equal olackoa Via. *weW) an alllmaaaut ~ orscted cual voting prion that ely dapuraa 4 vobing poor Per regi Valen [ Ke Frigle or d licate mat ball + coome votix ond chat no naitne ballets 1, dead voton). Q, (BE) Di the cpa cout exr in ataky “halt (acked slendia Lbenth My wWlunu—ca-cfack nang Mela my vein ( north Uroor (coger pu ola, cd lid me to protest ogra {Gies pHeUSA) us ‘algihing i Amorécan clgeralup to P nk te Vietnam iv persenal (‘coracte m the noo wig opin /slecdymal) f the DLO Prerideifial Clction benched aly cit the COVID-14 pandemic & prover’ infectice p prevent: hci thet the chao | lapil: Kya) @ dimple llr 4 opens O% pau BAS;CD ofr the usork {abniing th si tad of ta 84 tilkon dollars or neclourt -cacheck w ballleguoud ote . b, 3) Do th have alonding under re Prcdact ie chasm , thon « Gis 5 cat, te , appeal court “lbot the $ Defends yee ymal siglo “os a bend res Yay an 4 Ansnica, oud cust te ONLY produd f fanone Ce 10 orglanve to te. opeeel court thet wher festoutenT, USA) te. + Defrcdant launched the’ nd product, ths. (Restouo 1, tis USK) ) * Dilendoat pas lool. unforced midea ) ump, ard gone Congene mux 4 worn thal the wo product had {a that dostsh cll the “atl wen Oe Uucted equ) “words tle Deanble. The dif were triple ond dosdble VSbag ballots were sot ‘to the yore volar and yolog baat ere .porct™ Yo Jone bucky dead volans Ther Jack aw bola baglom 4 fecountredid in battlegrounds. ]) doll hae sending under FTCA or Fader Tok Clin Ack vdhon the Prusmble dlaled thet oa a ol a nears ib is thse © Ae US. Suprane. Gout ‘dye ) 4) conduct aa allman anecneafad osu Yung on olf non —areSealed quel Aon) votg prptlon { do pinning cal, Ont valiy por volar (to oak Wg fotim) ont only cout & (ole gor yolen bare annown ang the UWE Sine ik wes too apgansi ve & late for the {) clardaadts onglowes “tp pole accouilabi It | bohere CT wlig diplon (vk by ncad ) toad Gouge Ke the Ddardadds eryloyss Vie Nan é Vikh ne wu oe the seh ey Crecouat . ve ateqonds are | to let qunstor os Ma boat nportant howeer apguch wouke C04 pore my clain | q product realigan ce in ts cee SI be oka kowo the didnt court toa able to wavence lees ol FTCA V Fada “Terk san bere A gone came er gen judicata. anquanort shen Ue apged Coudt doaquad wie te dotiiet count lak Re Suck costo. oxqumert Was wore +o une mop ah «Rain, for Be aft oa see Ws dace sion ON “4 poled gag lcpace €,