No. 23-5848
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 14th-amendment abuse-of-discretion administrative-law appellate-review civil-rights district-court due-process equal-protection fifth-circuit identity-theft standing writ-of-prohibition
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in its interpretation and application of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : ® ° QUESTION! PRESENTED ° WHETHER BY REASON OF AN ABUSE OF DISCRETION COMMITTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT, IN REFUSING TO GRANT RELIEF PURSUANT TO RASER ABDALLAH'S AGGRAVATED IDENTITY-THEFT CHARGE, A FURTHER ABUSE OF DISCRETION BY THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS © PURSUANT TO DUBIN V. UNITED STATES (CITATIONS OMITTED} FOR WHICH ONLY THE SUPREME COURT CAN REMEDY THIS EGREGIOUS SITUATION BY GRANTING THE WRIT OF PROHIBITION. ; e : r ° r) ° ' ry : e : e :
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-05
Petition for a writ of prohibition and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2023)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent