No. 23-5853

Alex Adams v. Unknown Layton, Sergeant, Coffield Unit, et al.

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-20
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection free-speech judicial-review legal-jurisdiction standing state-law takings
Latest Conference: 2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state's actions in this case violated the petitioner's constitutional rights

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED AL? cour pte deg) ME Flot susece | OAs &k Tumate Oo PT HUT # UnIBUe B bABEVe THE IEAOIS oF THE STATE.” , THEY SAT LO 'T QuT ENTLTITATIN SATE Oe Prey HAVE REN TAKEN AW mr DaeeSer'’, AMO CLARO } MOT Vat FULL PPG FEE Ts THAT PADD OF) M55) CMSE P CAPT (RY chure THEA TAKE Mee For secur Case? (Yeme Looe fy CME WoMUETTO, DOP NUE 4 [sent fe MOS CHANSEST £ WAs sEyUAL HAN pS Ado ASTLAUEa ON SHUMAL occAstasur 2 QT por h wre LAG toh Praod! Mur By THte Not k BYAMPLE OC WHY CAAM RMAC JUStECE LE FOL WEE PLGA Cools PET WHAT THEY On TD Me Op, Not DN SRE GEMEAAL Uo 6 GX AT ATIVE BE Press CHANGES 2 , DbWEeusee Fs Not ELAN wow t You THEME THew PHEY SHovly HAVE AC OW MY ReHQle L Wis | SOUPAULY Who MEMALT AND PY PALCT, ¢

Docket Entries

2024-01-08
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 20, 2023)

Attorneys

Alex Adams
Alex Adams — Petitioner
Alex Adams — Petitioner