Does Petitioner have standing to sue Defendants for violating Petitioner's constitutional and civil rights?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Does Petitioner, Dmt MacTruong, a U.S. citizen living in New Jersey, have standing to sue in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, seven Defendants, some of whom live in Texas, other outside, who have maliciously acted in concert to achieve their Trumpist MAGA racist and misogynist agenda for all of America by making unconstitutional anti-abortion legislation in violation of Petitioner’s original copyrighted intellectual property entitled the CCO Network that was minutely and articulately explained and tangibly documented as a legal playwright scenario, in undisputed egregious violation of Petitioner’s constitutional and civil rights being expressly protected by 10 U.S.C. § 92] Art. 121, (Larceny and wrongful appropriation); and/or other applicable provision of the U.S. Laws and Constitution, such as 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) (Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding), or 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(c)(2) (Obstruction of and/or Attempt to Obstruct an Official Proceeding,) and/or 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights.) 2. In the event all elected Democratic and Republican representatives and leaders of America have publicly failed to perform their duties of defending and upholding the most important values, highest goals, and principles of the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, would any U.S. citizen, such as Petitioner herein, have both the sacred duty and legal standing to move a U.S. Court of competent jurisdiction or ultimately this USSC to unmask and hold accountable racist and misogynist criminals, such as the Respondents herein, who have acted in _ concert under color of State law known as the Texas Heartbeat Act, Senate Bill 8 (SB 8), by misrepresentations of fact or law to rape and murder innocent childbearing-aged (CBA) women, sometimes as young as 10 years of age, in egregious violation of the latter’s constitutional rights to life, liberty, property, privacy, and the pursuit of happiness, the 13" and 14 Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the 1866 and 1964 Civil Rights Acts, and the constitutional Roe v. Wade ruling by this Court in 1973? 1