No. 23-5860
John Carl Ferrell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: boykin-v-alabama constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review plea-bargaining sentencing supreme-court voluntary-plea
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a decision by the Supreme Court, after a plea is entered but before sentencing, present sufficient cause to consider if the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, in the context of Due Process as set out in Boykin v. Alabama?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does a decision by the Supreme Court, after a plea is entered but before sentencing, present sufficient cause to consider if the plea was entered knowingly and voluntarily, in the context of Due Process as set out in Boykin v. Alabama? 2
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-25
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2023)
Attorneys
John Carl Ferrell
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, attorney, Petitioner
Donald Lee Bailey — Don Bailey, attorney, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent