No. 23-5869
Craig Martin Shults v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process judicial-standard mutually-exclusive severance standard zafiro-precedent zafiro-v-united-states
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit's rigid 'irreconcilable and mutually exclusive' standard for severance survives this Court's decision in Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534 (1993)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit’s rigid “irreconcilable and mutually exclusive” standard for severance survives this Court’s decision in Zafiro v. United States, 506 U.S. 534 (1993), a case in which it agreed with the Seventh Circuit that such a standard “neither controlf[s] nor illuminate[s] the question of severance.” Id. at 537 (quoting United States v. Zafiro, 945 T'.2d 881, 886 (7th Cir. 1991)). | | | | |
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2023)
Attorneys
Craig Martin Shults
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
Ellis Murray Johnston III — Clarke Johnston Thorp & Rice PC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent