Darryl Smith v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Immigration
Whether judges and magistrates can collectively craft orders to impose a vexatious litigator tag on a pro se prisoner and ban his filings to appeal his criminal convictions and imprisonment
issues PResenTedD oo, i) INA 28 USE 2254 HABEAS CORPUS (APPEALING A CRIMINAL CONVICTION) CAN JUDGES AND MAGISTRATES .OF A U,S, DIST. COURT éollecrively CRAFT ORdeRS To IMPOSE A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR © . TAG ON A PROS@ PRISONER ANd BAN. His FILINGS Td APPEAL . HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS AAld IMPRISONMENT, 2) IN A 28 USC 2254 HABEAS CoRPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES ANd . MAGISTRATES USS THe VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR LAw To BAN. ANd Shur down A PRO S@ PRISONER'S PLEADINGS Whos | APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS Altd IMPRISONMENT, 3) in A 28 USC 1254 HABEAS CORPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES USE, Rely on ANd “BopRow* A VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN oRdeRs . | by ANOTHER JubEee ( Nor ASSiGNed To THE HABEAS CORPUS Gase) TO Shut dowN And BAN A PROSE PRISONER'S PLEADINGS Who 1S APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS ANd IMPRISONMENT. 4) in A 28 USC 2254 HABEAS CORPUS CASE, CAN JUDGES ARBI~ TRARIly IMPOSE A“ BoRROWed * VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN ON A PRo S@ PRISONER (who IS APPEALING HIS CRIMINAL CONVICTION) wiTHout ANy bue PROCESS PROCEdURAL HEARING To Allow THE prisoner To CONTEST THE SANCTION Avid be heard, 5) WW A 28 USC 2254 HABEAS CORPUS CASE CAN JUDGES imPose A ‘BoRROwed" VEXATIOUS LITIGATOR BAN ON A PROSe PRISONER CONTESTING HIS CONVICTIONS ANd Silence his ACTUAL MNo~ -@ence CLAIMS THAT IS SUPPORTed by INNOCENCE evidence: a en nee ae