No. 23-5879

Richard Wayne Johnson v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-10-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge sentencing standing statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) is a part of the mitigation of a defendant's sentence that can challenge the subject-matter jurisdiction of the matter

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

No question identified. : , Guestias Presented ' . , ; i 1, fy a Rederal eviminal case, whether 2 meéftien pursuant FO 18 Ue5il: $ 9820) is a peut i the M tiga tie 8 heRuduat . can challeage the subject-matter surisdichbn oer the mater 3 2. Ls the friture of the Disteut Court 2rd Court o” Appeels Fe , exontine the jurtsdiction of the bistried Court, whether Supe ste ; lout case law that demeastretes [ack of subject= matter juris diction (A fhe Case se yeres this Court te Hd fice Stich ever ‘pnd covrect the evrer 2 ) 2 whether affirmative answers tt gues hins one aad tute, uuder the totality of the civamstances, denonstores hat eguttable esfiyaeel egatust tHe Covernin0ent Should bee (11p2esech del revevs2l of fhe bouvict (ans ? ; a Ust_ at Lobes . AU PUES fer in the Cop tin oF the Case on phe Cvir “8, United Stodes yr Johnsen, 20AF U5. Aga, (ENS IESE (6h Cis Jue G, 23D Uaikd Stopes Vi Jthvson 222 Ws, Dist JEKis SPEG9 (wr bs ky, huguesk 1%, 422) aff. [able of Contents Opinions Belge ee / ju risdictisn . / ; Const datimal and State tery frowistons Fnyilved / Stofement of the Case ; G : Reasons Fer Cronting The Pet bin ; € I$ US. $BFIR (3 a Sep im ? The Oviginal federal Criminaj Cas : ° The Courts, Below Failed To Framine ——— q Fheir Fuvisdictign En This Case ‘ This Cage freseats what This lourt Requires a 2az te Baultably Estp The as “dex to fl ead ices : , A yjreadix A Op inten of bintkd States Court of Appeals . ; Appendsx 8B Meme ranedura apintea and Orley Gt bistrép Cour¢ a goF Mir Table of Autherthes Coheed 4P2 ited CISC148ED Arbeugh ve + H Cy, — — $$$ ve . S46 Ucss S00 (Aav6) ; Ashton vi Comeran County iw: LT. bist Ne, One, ee 7:97 9B ass SIF (1930) ; B64 tus 186 (1962) . Glan chard uo Ghy sf Menghig; 7 Res UeS Ayer CES S565 (644 Cis 2or®) | Beech ler, Ale t bemm';, —_-_ ? IFA 31 Cte 14-93 (2022) Burke wi City of Charles ton a fo. 139 B3d tei (#46 Cig (998) a Canadian Silite Fucus. Lace ve Sead Feids, Oorpey —_2/ ; 2022 usd. Dist: LEXIS BIBUES” (tw De Mithy 2622) Coheng Vv: Vir gine, a 13/9 wheat 264 (reat) ; | Cyrus vs itnivs ef Teledls, — ay | ROAR Urs Apy, LEXIS E784 (614 Gin 2622) ) Dobbs v. Jackson wemen's health organtea ben, —__ 13, 8 142 $1Cti 2228 (2022) a¢ ; alVo , Cases . pose Ex porte Boke lite, a ay | AIG 15) $38 (1929) . , First Am. Tile lee vr L6¢2494, —_ x3 480 Fi3d 43? (644. Gr, 2069) Fh Bend Gurty vi bovis, ———_— & : «13 G Slt 1843 Ger9) . Koclew vs Fite gerald, a2 GSD Wed. €00 (1982) : Harris v, kek, 43 489 ws255 (989) a Henderson Vi Shin sek, $< Mere SCA uss, 428 (Reid) ; Houston hr Leck, g ; YE] US. 2bE (1482) . _ ussein Vi City of Pecvysburg-— a? . 694 Fi Seay 232 (W1b,dh/e 2009) ; . Hublo Vi Davis, ——<—$ $$$ 2-23 ¥54 WSs 370 C1982) : Kelley ve Untkd Shky 9, 9-0 . 23. us 5> 138 (1909) . G09 Fiduyy. 3d SOX (MbiOhis ROPAD ; -\yr L255 | | ae King yi Mergen, al a, ROB ite 1 Bist; LEKIS 139322 (WD: thle 20D Kon trick Ve Ryan, SO 18 SHO thid» $43 (z004) , lake County we Aollins, a i ; 130 ited) LER 29 . Me bullock y, Marylore, to . + wheat B16 (1819) Milke vi Iehas00a, — (= SIS Wide 900 945) | , Natl fedin_of frcep. Bus, vo Sebeliugy——a 1B . SE? ted: S14 (2012) . . Mien tatkd Shes, iS S06 UWS) 224 C ) hartawest Austin Mute ithih Dest t beldesg, 48 SSF Us: 193 Cae?) . Ran 4e%, Tuc vi qui teble bik Assurance Seey—_— ai 196 Fad 468 Cé+y G4 1952) : . Silber stein ve City of bay tery RR 44 fi3d 306 (64 Gr, 200) — Saute Corelina bi Unthd Shiks, Wl , Wie Steel bor Wi Citizens fer a Bethy Faw — 4, 10 . S23 US: 83 0998) Stewart vi Health Revenue Reewvery Geugy Lg. —-—— G QOAR ue5, bISt, LEXIS H2EP Cus. Ds Tenne 20a) Taylor V1 daiked Stofes, —_._ /3, 4 . 136 sict. 2079. (a0t6) . TL Poster bids. Gucrdion Frdse loi we . S68 Pes Apex: B16 (074K, 2004) . Utah vi fveny a A4O-2/ SBE WiS: £52 (Aeoz) 297 e546 (7936) . — nl hed Shaks vi CfA, ——— — ——$ $< & SBS ws$, 629 (2004) Unik States C1 Kel, MAS : 98 AS: 343 (1225) | United Stokes v4 bays, 4G SIS ihe 737 (1998) | ni feel Stokes ¥ Tohes09, —_—_—_—_-2023 itis App, LEXIS

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2023)

Attorneys

Richard Johnson
Richard Wayne Johnson — Petitioner
Richard Wayne Johnson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent