1. The Pro se presents that the decision of the fifth circuit court of appeal violates due process right of 14th amend right of the pro se for failure to honor its duty of care to determine the racism claims alleged by the pro se against the defendant because the pro se completed the second master degree requirement of 12 credit which the Amberton university refuse to answer when summon was issued to defendant to state which portion of the credit that the pro se did not complete (See Exhibit 1 showing that the pro se completed the 12 credit which was issued by the Amberton university; see exhibit 2 of the university law that 12 credit is required to obtain second master's in managerial science which was signed into law by the university president. See email communication with the student advisor stated that additional 12 credit is required to get the 12 credit). The 14th amendment is superior to the argument of the defendant attorney that his client did not act under the color of the state to refuse issue 2nd master certificate to the pro se because Amberton university is private university not obligated by state law o

Whether the decision of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals violated the pro se's due process rights under the 14th Amendment by failing to properly consider the pro se's claims of racial discrimination against the private university president's refusal to issue a second master's degree certificate