No. 23-5886
Phillip Charles Gibbs v. Becky Carl, Warden
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: appellate-review automatic-reversal constitutional-violation habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel prejudice-analysis sixth-amendment state-practice strickland-standard strickland-v-washington unconstitutional-state-practice
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is shown by an attorney's failure to preserve a claim that would result in an automatic reversal on appeal because of an unconstitutional state practice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether prejudice under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), is shown by an attorney’s failure to preserve a claim that would result in an automatic reversal on appeal because of an unconstitutional state practice? i
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent Becky Carl, Warden to respond filed.
2023-10-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 24, 2023)
2023-08-25
Application (23A175) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 29, 2023.
2023-08-17
Application (23A175) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 30, 2023 to October 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Becky Carl, Warden
Ann Maurine Sherman — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent
Phillip Gibbs
Benton C. Martin — Federal Community Defender, Petitioner