Did a lower Court violate Rights in issuing an unheard of, $100,000 bond on a misdemeanor, when there was overwhelming evidence showing there was no crime whatsoever, and upon review and recognition by the Prosecutors office over a year later, it was shown that no crime ever occurred?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did a lower Court violate Rights in issuing an unheard of, $100,000 bond on a misdemeanor, when there . was overwhelming evidence showing there was no crime whatsoever, and upon review and recognition . by the Prosecutors office over a year later, it was shown that no crime ever occurred? Did the lower Court have a conflict of interest, as admitted by Judge Hartnett as she recused herself from the case? Did the lower Court err in that Judge Hartnett admitted to conflict of interest and recused herself, yet Hartnett was allowed to handle the case and made orders for several months? Did the lower Court abuse its discretion in denying Petitioner a change of venue due to conflict of interest and distance hardship, even after Judge Hartnett admitted conflict of interest and recused herself from the case? Did the lower Court abuse its discretion in combining the two very seperate cases filed by Petitioner; _ case 2021CV01367 against Timothy Heavlin and the Alliance P.D. and case 2022CV00347 against Jennifer Arnold? Were the Petitioner's Civil, Constitutional and Criminal Rights, along with Liberties violated numerous times in these matters?