Exclusion of evidence on prostitution and lying by alleged victim

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . I. The District Court violated the Defendant's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights by excluding evidence and Argument under Fed. R. Evid. 412, specifically that one of the alleged victims engaged in prostitution before the alleged crimes in this case and lied during the Investigation. : II. The District Court erred by denying Defendant's request for Jury instructions concerning the Kidnapping elements of consent before transportation of the alleged victim and withdrawal of consent after initially consenting. III. The District Court erred by denying Defendant's request for Jury instructions on the knowledge element to the Counts of Transportation of Minors. : IV. The District Court erred in aliowing the Government to admit certain evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). V. The District Court erred in:allowing’ the Government to admit certain evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 413. | VI. The District Court erred in denying Defendant's Motion for a new trial. , 1 i