Whether the United States District Court of Kansas and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit misused FED. R. CIV. P. 56 (c)(1)(a) in granting summary judgment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Cedric Mack brings forth whether The United States District Court of Kansas and The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, questionably misused FED. R. CIV. P. 56 (c )(1){a). The ruling interlocks with a review that was blindsided by summary judgment under FRCP. 56. Where the judges’ nonfulfiliment to bond the standard of disputation of material fact underprivileged. Cedric Mack of a jurys’ reflection of Focus Workforce Management and J.M. Smucker's dearth of trust pertaining to discrimination and retaliation. Thereby, the difference of opinion with the council in the Third Second Circuits, Supreme Court, and add-ons, when it points out this Court’s ruling in St. Marys’ Honor Center, Reeves, Tolan, Anderson, and “add " on. 2. The United States District Court For The District Of Kansas questionably misused Rule 37. Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions (effective December 1, 2013). (2) Sanctions Sought in the District Where the Action is Pending. (vii). (2). Failure to admit. (e). Failure A Discovery Plan. Therefore, the difference of opinion with the council in the U.S. Supreme Court, United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania when it points out rulings in Hammond, Hovey, Roth, Campbell, Societe, and add-ons. 3. Courts questionably misused 18 U.S. Code * 1621 1623-Perjury generally. Therefore, the differences of opinion with the council in the U.S. Supreme, 11th Circuit, and 6th Circuit Court. Dunnigan, Havens, Durham’s, and add-ons. 4. Courts questionably misused S. 1380-Due Process Protections Act 116th Congress (2019-2020). Equal Protection, Therefore, the difference of opinion with the council in the Supreme Court. Timbs, Goldberg, Loving, and add-ons. 5. Courts questionably misused 28 U.S.C* 1915 (e)(1). Therefore, the differences of opinion with the council in the 4th Circuit, 5th Circuit, and add-ons. Cook, Branch, Whisenant, : Mallard, and add-ons. 6. Courts questionably misused * 42.23 Opposition replies and sur-replies. (a)(b) Therefore, . 6. Did the Tenth Circuit of The United States Court of Appeals misuse its authority by factoring in oral arguments, and discovery material the courts had access to. Rule 34. Oral Argument (a)(2)(a)(b)(c). Addin Allen, Poller, and add-ons. Factoring in did the Tenth Circuit of The United States Court of Appeals misuse its discretion in applying Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery Hickman, Palmer, and add-ons. The District Court of Kansas denies The Petitioner's right to counsel. 1. St. Mary’s Honor Center v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993). .8,, 11,16 2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prod. Inc., 530 U.S. 133 (2000).8, 11, 16,20 3. Tolan v. Cotton, 572 U.S. 650 sees By 7,20 4. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-48 (1986)... eee 7 5. Hammond Packing Co. v. Arkansas, 212 U.S. 322 (1909)...