Whether injured voters have standing to challenge the use of uncertified voting machines that may have compromised the 2020 election

QUESTIONS PRESENTED \ ' 1) A conflict exists between decisions recently reni dered by two State Supreme Courts which affirm injured voters have standing to be heard, and the ! decisions rendered by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in this matter, and this must be resolved as this decision is of National Importance as it prohibits not only Petitioner’s right to vote, but every U.S. Citizen’s right to vote. : 2) A conflict exists between State and Federal Law involving Petitioner’s Constitutional right to vote : and machines used in the United States not certi' fied per Federal HAVA law, which are stealing the : right of suffrage from not only the Petitioner, but . every U.S. Citizen, and Petitioner motions this Court to settle the many conflicts which exist with the States’ use of these uncertified, compromised : machines, including a) Should Petitioner and all US. Citizens continue to be denied their Constitutional right to vote by being forced to use electronic voting machines that have been and still can be accessed and votes flipped, and b) should Americans be forced to further endure the Amer: ica-harming policies of a President and Vice President treasonously and fraudulently installed with a flip of these machines’ vote tallies in many States in the 2020 election? 3) A conflict exists between law as issued by this Court and in our Constitution and the failure of : Judges in the two lower courts in this matter to ; act upon this law and their Oaths to uphold the ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued Constitution and hear these reports of treason and overthrow of our country. These matters of dereliction of duty and failure to hear treasonous matters reported to them must therefore be quickly resolved as the security of our nation has been com: promised.