No. 23-5904
IFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure excusable-neglect ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel postconviction-motion sentencing standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-01-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals misapplied the standard of review applicable to assertion of justifiable excuse or excusable neglect for belated postconviction motion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Whether the Colorado Court of Appeals misapplied the standard of review applicable to assertion of justifiable excuse or excusable neglect for belated postconviction motion? Whether both postconviction attorney(s) rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to raise claims related to prior counsels’ performance at trial and on appeal? Did postconviction attorney(s) rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing _to file a timely motion for reconsideration of sentence under Crim.P.Rule 35(b)?
Docket Entries
2024-01-08
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/5/2024.
2023-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 27, 2023)
Attorneys
Hazhar A. Sayed
Hazhar A. Sayed — Petitioner