Whether a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 is a point in the litigation permitting a defendant to challenge subject-matter jurisdiction, where case law by this Court establishes such lack of jurisdiction in the Article III inferior court

No question identified. : n Questions Gesented é Lo In @ Federal criminal conviction cose, whether 9 mpftien under 1% 4+ Sel. £35820 1s 9 Paint in the Ubgation perniitting a defendent to challege subsect-mafter jurtsdlitada, where case few by this Court estobl/skes such, lack of yurtsdictioa in the Article Il mferior court: & In e tederal criminal conviction case, on a multiple -count . Ud tndictment, whether a lea dgreement offered by the Preseeation fo froceed on one count Fo ovoid joo sstéle Consecutive sentences IF Convickd in a jury tial Const’ dukes Coercian end threats for whith Federal hale of Criminal Procedure Sab) may be used, even in fats Court, 70 moke Good fhe wrong done to invalidate the Convichans EA Tn 2 fecleval criminal! case, whether this Courts constructon of the Constitution that coustite tHienal Article courts cannet be conterred with “crimina/” c23e gurtsdiction (a such courts foceted within a Sfete vequives the courts # preted the rights of the rdiidugl against such conviction by 2 court shown to fack “Yledsital fower” over crimes when sitting within a Stake this Court bas Seld Congress lacks authori'ty wi center in such courts a o / _