No. 23-5929
Anthony Andrews v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-provisions due-process judicial-procedure jurisdiction parole sentencing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the construction of the Aggregate Series & the Pot of Aid Parole Release is constitutional
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : 1) Des Peyton v, Rowe, SU us SY C168! evi + prociedings cas tb She _constrechien _of Pm Aggregate Sertes & ale Be Pot of Ad. Pare Rilease u & vic BIBS gq wd Baoan “Goy gaa ; 2) vd Nes, Aggcc gare (SEatencé tmpossd . ‘ol ATES US. ve Cone Cen iy _ Gan para, (42 91 238 (2.022) ond < Cohen quan LE St ZEST
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-09-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 1, 2023)
2023-06-15
Application (22A1086) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 28, 2023.
2023-05-18
Application (22A1086) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 30, 2023 to September 28, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent