Brent Douglas Cole v. R. D. Keyes, Warden
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Question not identified
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1 1) THe USCA 7TH CIR. ISSUED AN ORDER OF NON-INVOLVEMENT FOR THE U, ' §, ‘ATTORNEY FROM WISCONSIN, AND HELD MY OBJECTION TO BE A MOTION, 3 DENIED IT INSTEAD OF ORDERING THE U.S. ATTORNEY FROM CALIFORNIA, WHO HAS BEEN LITIGATING THIS CAUSE SINCE OcT, 2014 To RESPOND, THUS 5 RENDERING IT AN ADVERSARIAL PROCEEDING WITH NO ADVERSARY, AND THE JUDGES AS “BOTH JUDGE AND PARTY, ARBITER AND ADVOCATE IN THE SAME 7 CAUSE.” AND VIOLATING THE PRINCIPLE “THAT A JUDGE MUST NECESSARILY BE FREE FROM ALL BIAS AND PARTIALITY.” INLAND STEEL Co, v, NLRB, 9 109 F.2p 9, 20, 1940 U.S. U.S, App. LEXIS 4879 (CA 7TH CIR.), To “CAUSE TO CEASE FOR A TIME” OR “FAIL TO MEET OBLIGATIONS” IS 11 To ‘SUSPEND’, WHICH WAS THE EFFECT OF THE COURT'S COURSE OF ACTION, I HAVE URGED THAT THERE IS NO SHOWING OF JURISDICTION ON THE FACE 13 OF THE RECORD AND THAT THE TRIAL COURT WANTONLY CIRCUMVENTED THE NECESSARY PROCESS FOR REMOVING A PRISONER TO A JURISDICTION NOT THE 15 SAME, THE WRIT AD PROSEQUENDUM, SUSPENDING THE PRIVILEGE 9/18/2014, VIOLATING ART I, 89, CL.2, AND THE NORTHWEST ORD., ART.2 (1787), 17 DID SAID CouRT DENY THE APPELLANT DUE PROCESS OF LAW, AND/OR APPEAL, AND/OR ART I, 89, cL.2, U.S. CONST., AND/OR SAID COMPACT? 19 RESTATED: WAS THE USDC EASTERN DIST. OF CALIF. WITHOUT SUBJECT 20 MATTER JURISDICTION AND/OR APPELLANT DIVESTED OF HIS ENTITLEMENTS? 23 2) THE APPELLANT WAS CONVICTED OF ASSAULT PER 18 USC S111(A) & (B), AFTER BEING ACQUITTED ON STATE CHARGES FOR THE SAME INCIDENT FOR 25 SUBSTANTIALLY THE SAME CHARGES, ASSAULT ON AN OFFICER, WHICH OCCURRED WITHIN THE EXCLUSIVE TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF CALIFORNIA, I 27. WAS MORTALLY WOUNDED, SHOT FIVE (5) TIMES WITHIN TWELVE SECONDS OF OFFICERS DRAWING THEIR GUNS ON ME FIRST AND FIRING SEVENTEEN (17) 29 BULLETS AT ME. IT IS A MATTER OF RECORD THAT MR. HARDIN DREW HIS GUN ON ME WHILE MINE WAS STILL HOLSTERED IN ITS EXTERNAL HOLSTER, 32 I HAD MADE NO THREATS OR PROVOCATIONS. DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLIFFORD NEWELL “CLEARED THE INVOLVED OFFICERS IN THE BRENT COLE SHOOTING 34 INCIDENT OF ANY CRIMINAL LIABILITY, 11. AND HAS FILED CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST BRENT COLE. ...” SERGEANT MATT WHITING ID#: 12888, 10/ 36 30/2014, THERE WAS NO JUDICIAL HEARING OR WITNESS TESTIMONY, DID THE PANEL JUDGES LIBEL THE APPELLANT IN THEIR ORDER ON 6/28/23? L