Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g) permits conviction for the possession of any firearm that has ever crossed state lines at any time in the indefinite past, and, if so, if it is facially unconstitutional? Whether 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1) comports with the Second Amendment? Subsidiary Question: Whether this Court should hold the instant Petition pending United States v. Rahimi, 22-915, _U.S._, 2023 WL 4278450 (June 30, 2023)(granting cert.), given the government’s concession in Garland v. Range, No. 23374, that Rahimi presents “closely related Second Amendment issues” with respect to constitutional challenges to 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(1), and justifies a decision to “hold the petition for a writ of certiorari” in Range “pending its decision Rahimi’, Government’s Petition for Certiorari in Garland v. Range, 23-374, at 7 (Filed October 5, 2023), available at , last visited October 20, 20283? i