No. 23-5942

Christopher Rayquaz Singletary v. United States

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-11-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: 18-usc-1951(a) 18-usc-924(c) crime-of-violence criminal-law hobbs-act sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-taylor
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2023-12-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Hobbs Act robbery qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether Hobbs Act robbery, as proscribed by 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), categorically qualifies as a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), in light of this Court’s decision in United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022).

Docket Entries

2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-10-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 4, 2023)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendixProof of ServiceMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Christopher Rayquaz Singletary
Jennifer C. Leisten — Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDNC, Petitioner
Jennifer C. Leisten — Office of the Federal Public Defender, EDNC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent