No. 23-5946
Dravion Sanchez Ware v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process identification identification-evidence law-enforcement physical-restraint sentencing-guidelines surveillance-evidence
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-04-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the physical restraint enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(B) requires more than pointing a gun at someone
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED L As held by other Circuits, the physical restraint enhancement in US.S.G. § 2B3.1(b)(4)(B) requires more than pointing a gun at someone, and the Eleventh Circuit's decision to the contrary should be reversed, as it is clearly out of line with the other Circuits. I. A law enforcement officer should not be permitted to identify a defendant from surveillance videos where he is only familiar with the defendant based on his post-arrest interview, at which time the officer has already plainly determined that the defendant is the perpetrator. i
Docket Entries
2024-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/19/2024.
2024-03-21
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-02-08
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 21, 2024.
2024-02-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 20, 2024 to March 21, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 20, 2024. See Rule 30.1.
2024-01-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 19, 2024 to February 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-12-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 19, 2024.
2023-12-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 20, 2023 to January 19, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-11-20
Response Requested. (Due December 20, 2023)
2023-11-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-10-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 4, 2023)
Attorneys
Dravion Ware
Leigh Ann Webster — Strickland Webster, LLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent