Whether the district court's decision was erroneous

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED oo ae cen 1 PQUESTION ONE ee ae a : Lo WHETHER “Te AcreaLS Cours Necisio__Wwas a __ . ERGoNE0US WHEN THe Cover DeCwEh THAT: THe “Two oo _ _ Police oF rcees ANd The Te NeTectves Hae A LE@mimets ee ZNoLOGr Ce INTHEREST_AND_AN OGTECTIVELY REASoN MELE | a wa BASIS PLRce OVERLY “Tet HAAN CURES @eHine nae | | munWe’s Back AND RESTRAMING Hin ON A CHremcek= Soaks | Le taen aecwaing ani me TeRRTAG Hn OR EHes, GENIN ; i a Hwa DRINKING Wifes AND USE GF SATRoom. AND Mocking Him | | 0F ns Accent AND ORIGIN WHENEVER tte Gecers foe tELP. _ ve fete ne QUESTION Two {oo _ Whe tee axeeents Covat’s secisiun Mis seeoweous | _ When “The court orci THAT “Tiere WAS _No_WoLaTions _ | | OF EauaL PRoTECTION clause AND 42 usc $1981, AND Also |. _ DECin=s THAT “Whe oF ricees.. Hie 6 LEG@\ Time Law fe ee ENRRCEMENT PURPOSE”, WHEN “Wie Ofriaes meckes Mme _ =| un iwe Taet He des a ceney thx acca” ane “iT | a Makes IT Ven woece’ That es thom amica, Wie | . | one _muniwe 2ePeiEnLY Requested To Ge UNCER, UNeecren | INER , BE ReEMNED “Fgom THRE _CAPENDICALSonken Love, _&e : _—GWEN twATER AND Ge Allowen “To Use be BATHROOM. _ bao . : 4