Whether the realistic probability test first set forth in Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007), applies when comparing a federal predicate statute to a generic federal crime, as the Ninth Circuit currently holds, or whether it only applies when comparing a state predicate statute to a generic federal crime, as this Court held in United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022), and at least seven other circuits hold?

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the realistic probability test first set forth in Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (2007), applies when comparing a federal predicate statute to a generic federal crime, as the Ninth Circuit currently holds, or whether it only applies when comparing a state predicate statute to a generic federal crime, as this Court held in United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022), and at least seven other circuits hold? pretix