No. 23-5969
Tags: compulsory-process confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence false-accusation fourteenth-amendment motive sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Petitioner’s Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated when the trial court prohibited the defense from placing before the jury the alleged victim’s first revelation of the Petitioner’s purported criminal conduct to his mother, stepfather, and law enforcement officers (evidence that defense counsel argued established a motive for the alleged victim to falsely accuse the Petitioner). il B. PARTIES INVOLVED The parties involved are identified in the style of the case. iii
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-12-01
Rescheduled.
2023-12-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/1/2023.
2023-11-09
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2023-10-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2023)
2023-09-19
Application (23A252) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 30, 2023.
2023-09-11
Application (23A252) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 28, 2023 to October 30, 2023, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Semaan Makdissi
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner
State of Florida