No. 23-5971
Kevondric Fezia v. United States
Tags: closing-arguments confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process hearsay jury non-testifying-witness prosecutorial-argument sixth-amendment witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-12-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Confrontation Clause apply to statements made by a prosecutor during closing arguments that detail for the jury what a non-testifying witness would have said if the person would have testified?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Confrontation Clause apply to statements made by a prosecutor during closing arguments that detail for the jury what a non-testifying witness would have said if the person would have testified? 2
Docket Entries
2023-12-11
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/8/2023.
2023-11-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-11-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 7, 2023)
Attorneys
Kevondric Fezia
Dustin Talbot — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent